Obyektno Orientirovannoe Proektirovanie

[Italyanets]

podelites opitom v oblasti obyektno orientirovannogo proektirovaniya

kto nit iz vas ispolzoval rational rose ili drugie instrumenti podobnie? Menya interesuet ne programmirovanie samo, a imenno proektirovanie ishodnih klassov i obyektov chisto virtualnoe, ne privyazannoe k kakomu to opredelennomu yaziku

[Гость _Serges90_]

Eto ochen' obshii vopros. OOP (kak i mnogoe drygoe:) mozhno delat' na liste bumagi (dlya menya do six por nezamenimyi instrument, so studencheskix let); Rational Rose xorosha dlya:

- sredstvo documentacii development processa for > chem 10 developers rabotayshix v ramkax odnoi architecture ;

- samo-distsiplina (eto sporno);

- experience v resume.

Vse zavisit ot klassa i vzaimoponimania developers. Dlya horoshix sw. engineers Rational - eto podspor'ye chtoby documentirovat' svoi idei i donesti do kolleg. V bol'shix (i srednix) companies v US zloupotreblenie Rational chasten'ko vylivalos v ogromnyy traty vremeni - a potom, kogda sroki nachinali real'no podzhimat', narod pleval na vse i pisal kak umel.

Kstati, new versions of Visio otchen' dazhe xoroshi dlya sozdania UML diagrams, i gorazdo deshevle chem Rational. Krome togo, nachinaya s 2000, Rational ispol'zyet proklyatye licence servers, chto stanovitsya prosto neschastyem, esli etot licence server sidit gte-to on the WAN (y nas tak bylo). Tak chto recommendyy Rational Rose 98 - functionality pochti takaya-zhe, i nikakix licence servers.

Chto kasaetsya OOP, to tyt nado prikypit' i pochitat' raznye ymnie knigi, takie kak 'Design Patterns' i UML tutorials, izychat', i primenyat' k svoim proektam.

Konechno, dlya reverse engineeringa kakoi-nibud' vazhnoi Java library, JAD -> Rational poroi odin is samyx lychshix vihodov. No ty vrode ne etogo xochesh'.

Rezumirya, xoroshie development teams vyigrayt ot ispol'zovania Rational, esli na proekt dostatochno vremeni. Obratnoe, voobshche govorya neverno - ispolzovanie Rational ne sdelaet slabye development teams sil'nee.

Ydachi, Serge